Regional right ventricular remodeling and function in children with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension vs those with pulmonary valve stenosis: Insights into mechanics of right ventricular dysfunction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) pressure overload in the context of pulmonary stenosis (PS) has a much better prognosis than in the context of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (iPAH), which may be related to differences in global and regional RV remodeling and systolic function. We compared RV mechanics in children with PS to those with iPAH, aiming to identify mechanisms and markers of RV dysfunction. METHODS: Eighteen controls, 18 iPAH and 16 PS patients were retrospectively studied. Age, BSA, and sex distribution were comparable. Two-dimensional echocardiography, blood flow and tissue Doppler, and longitudinal RV deformation were analyzed. ANCOVA-including RV systolic pressure (RVSP) and length as covariates-was used to compare patient groups. RESULTS: RV systolic pressure was higher in iPAH vs PS (96.8±25.4 vs 75.4±18.9 mm Hg, P=.011). Compared to controls, PS patients showed mild dilation (P<.01) and decreased longitudinal deformation (P<.001) at the RV apex. Compared to both PS and controls, iPAH patients showed marked spherical RV dilation (P<.001), reduced global, RV free wall and septal longitudinal deformation (iPAH -22.07%±4.35% vs controls -28.18%±1.69%; -9.98%±4.30% vs -17.45%±2.52%; P<.001) and RV postsystolic shortening (P<.001). RV transverse shortening (radial performance) was increased in PS (31.75%±10.35%; P<.001) but reduced in iPAH (-1.62%±11.11% vs controls 12.00%±7.74%; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Children with iPAH demonstrate adverse global and regional RV remodeling and mechanics compared to those with PS. Mechanisms of RV systolic dysfunction in iPAH include decreased longitudinal deformation, decreased or absent transverse shortening, and postsystolic shortening. These markers may be useful to identify children at risk of RV failure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".