Rethinking Archives as Digital: The Consequences of "Paper Minds" in Illustrations and Definitions of E-archives
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La culture et les discours affectent notre comprhension des archives dans l'environnement numrique : les ides prconues, les normes et les pratiques dveloppes dans une administration fonde sur le support papier influencent et limitent nos perceptions des archives numriques.Il peut tre difficile d'imaginer autrement les archives dans le contexte de la cyberadministration et de l'environnement rseaut dans lequel les questions archivistiques deviennent plus complexes.Ceci est un problme global puisque les exigences en matire de documents numriques sont diffrentes de celles pour les documents sur support papier.Cet article emprunte une approche discursive, se concentrant sur les ouvertures et les fermetures de concepts autour de l'ide des archives dans les administrations municipales sudoises.La thorie critique sert de lentille travers laquelle on peut comprendre les archives de faon gnrale et les archives numriques de faon particulire.L'analyse est effectue aprs avoir tabli trois principes de base que l'administration publique en Sude devrait viser : (i) adopter un concept holistique des archives; (ii) prconiser une approche proactive en matire de gestion de documents; et (iii) s'efforcer d'intgrer le processus archivistique dans les objectifs et les occasions de la cyberadministration.Les conclusions rvlent que le manque de fermetures , c'est-dire des principes qu'on comprend de la mme faon et une dfinition commune des archives numriques, peut restreindre la comprhension des archives dans des contextes numriques et contraindre le dveloppement de leur plein potentiel.Du mme coup, le manque d'ouvertures vis--vis des nouvelles faons d'envisager et de concevoir les archives numriques peut limiter l'tendue de possibilits que peuvent offrir les formats numriques. L'esprit papier peut prsupposer une progression par tapes, partir de stade actif jusqu'au stade archivistique, qui est inutile dans le contexte numrique.ABSTRACT Culture and discourses affect our understanding of the archive in the digital environment: preconceptions, norms, and practices developed in a paper-based administration colour and limit perceptions of digital archives.It can be difficult to reimagine the archive in the context of e-government and the networked environment, where the complexity of archival issues increases.This is a global problem, because the requirements of digital records are different from those of paper records.This article takes a discursive approach, focusing on "openings" and "closings" of concepts surrounding the idea of archives in Swedish municipal governments.Critical theory is ARChIvARIA 83 (Spring 2017): 81-108 Archivaria, The Journal of the Association of Canadian Archivists -All rights reserved used as a lens through which we understand archives in general, and digital archives in particular.The analysis is made after establishing three basic principles that public administration in Sweden should work toward: (i) adopting a holistic concept of the archive; (ii) taking a proactive approach to records management; and (iii) striving to integrate the archiving process with the goals and opportunities of e-government.The result indicates that the lack of "closings," i.e., commonly understood principles and a shared definition of an e-archive, may restrict the understanding of archives in digital contexts and constrain the development of their full potential.At the same time, the lack of "openings" toward new ways of thinking about and designing e-archives may narrow the scope of possibilities that the digital formats can offer."Paper minds" may presuppose a stepwise progression of records, from active to archival, that is unnecessary in the digital context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it