MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A46: Nup153 and Nup50 promote recruitment of 53BP1 to DNA repair foci by antagonizing BRCA1-dependent events

2017· article· en· W2604669596 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Douglas R. Mackay, Katharine S. Ullman

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDNA repairHomologous recombinationDNA damageCell biologyBiologyContext (archaeology)Poly ADP ribose polymeraseChromatinNLSNuclear localization sequenceDNAMolecular biologyPolymeraseChemistryCancer researchGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study focuses on an unexpected role for particular nuclear pore proteins in the antagonism between the DNA repair factors BRCA1 and 53BP1, and the impact this has on the response to poly(A) ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibition. Repair of DNA double strand breaks, a cornerstone of genomic integrity, typically follows one of two distinct pathways: the high fidelity process of homologous recombination (HR) repair, in which BRCA1 plays a key role, and the more error-prone process of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), which relies on 53BP1. The balance between NHEJ and HR depends, in part, on whether 53BP1 predominates in binding to damage sites, where it protects the DNA ends from resection and prevents HR from occurring. Conversely, BRCA1 binding counteracts 53BP1-mediated events to promote HR repair. While mutual antagonism between BRCA1 and 53BP1 has been appreciated for some time, factors that modulate this relationship are only beginning to be elucidated. The nuclear pore component Nup153 has previously been implicated in the DNA damage response, specifically in promoting nuclear import of 53BP1. To further explore the role of Nup153 in this context, we engineered an additional strong nuclear localization sequence (NLS) on 53BP1 and found that this overrides the requirement for Nup153 in nuclear import of 53BP1. While 53BP1-NLS is recruited normally to DNA damage foci in control-treated cells, its accumulation at these sites is still severely impaired in Nup153-depleted cells, indicating that Nup153 has an additional and distinct role in 53BP1 intranuclear targeting. These observations are further underscored by the additional finding that a second nuclear pore protein, Nup50, is also required for intranuclear targeting of 53BP1, yet makes no discernable contribution to 53BP1 nuclear import. Of note, depletion of a third nucleoporin (Tpr), which is part of the same structural element of the nuclear pore, did not alter this DNA damage response pathway. To gain insight into the pathway affected by Nup153 and Nup50 and to understand how their role fits into a clinically relevant context, we probed the consequences of reducing Nup153 and Nup50 levels in cells deficient in BRCA1 activity. We found that the requirement for Nup153 and Nup50 in promoting 53BP1 recruitment to damage foci is abrogated under these circumstances. In cells where HR repair is otherwise defective, however, robust recruitment of 53BP1 to DNA damage foci requires Nup153 and Nup50. Together, our results provide novel insight into 53BP1 regulation during the DNA damage response and are consistent with a model where Nup153 and Nup50 normally promote 53BP1 targeting by counteracting BRCA1-dependent events. These findings have important implications with regard to PARP inhibition, a therapeutic strategy thought to capitalize on defective HR repair by forcing inappropriate use of NHEJ, culminating in cellular toxicity. Accordingly, we found that decreased levels of Nup153 and Nup50 do not affect the 53BP1-dependent pathway in BRCA1-deficient cells exposed to PARP inhibitor treatment, but still impair this response in cells deficient for BRCA2 or when the ATM and ATR signaling pathways are inhibited. Our results indicate that Nup153 and Nup50, as factors that modulate 53BP1 activity, belong to a novel category of biomarkers that could be screened to make better predictions of response to PARP inhibitor treatment. Citation Format: Douglas R. Mackay, Katharine S. Ullman. Nup153 and Nup50 promote recruitment of 53BP1 to DNA repair foci by antagonizing BRCA1-dependent events [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on DNA Repair: Tumor Development and Therapeutic Response; 2016 Nov 2-5; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2017;15(4_Suppl):Abstract nr A46.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.940

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer ResearchSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207