INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES (ICTS) IN BUSINESS IN ORIGINAL PEOPLE OF CHILE AND CANADA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research approached on the entrepreneurship spirit of the Indigenous Communities in Chile and Canada using Information and Communications Technologies. Based on the work called: How indigenous communities in Chile and Canada undertake business sustainable and can to do them profitable through information technology and are integrated into the digital age: the Case of a Mapuche Community in Chol Chol Temco-Chile and the Inuit community in Quebec-Canada. In order to get the necessary information through interviews, secondary sources and some questionnaire qualitative and quantitative applied by convenience in communities in Chile and Canada. To be compare the reality between both communities the degree of entrepreneur, absorption digital, profit and development using ICT. The main conclusion, confirm that the Indigenous Communities at Canada have competitive advantages that allow have sustainable businesses, business know-how through information technology, be integrated to new economy and they could transfer this knowledge to communities in Chile. This study will allow that Chilean politician, entrepreneurs and academics can help to implement the plans oriented to remove from underdevelopment to the indigenous communities and bring development to sustainable and profitable businesses. For this study, to be obtained the collaboration in Chile: Mapuche indigenous community Venancio Conopan in Chol-Chol, Temuco IX Region. And in Canada the Inuit community of Nunavik - Quebec. Centre for research in Chile and Canada. In addition to consultations valuable to researchers, academics and officials from government agencies and universities in Chile and Canada
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it