MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A prognostic factor (PF) index for overall survival in a HER2-negative endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC) population: Analysis from the ATHENA trial.

2013· article· en· W2604716799 on OpenAlexaff
Antonio Llombart‐Cussac, Xavier Pivot, Laura Biganzoli, H. Cortés-Funes, Kathleen I. Pritchard, Jean‐Yves Pierga, Ian E. Smith, Christoph Thomssen, Gemma Palacios, Stefanie Srock, Miguel Sampayo, Javier Cortés

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineOncologyMetastatic breast cancerPopulationBreast cancerTaxaneProgression-free survivalClinical endpointAnthracyclineCancerChemotherapyClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

555 Background: Chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients (pts) with HER2-negative endocrine-resistant MBC. The considerable variability in overall survival (OS) within this population relates essentially to prognostic factors (PF). Increasingly, large studies based on progression-free survival (PFS) as a primary endpoint are now being questioned. An accurate PF index may help in designing innovative trials with appropriate pts selection according to overall survival (OS) prognosis. Methods: The ATHENA trial assessed the safety of first-line bevacizumab combined with non-anthracycline-containing therapy in 2264 pts treated in 37 countries from 2006 to 2009. Pt characteristics, safety, and efficacy have been reported [Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011;130:133-43]. Sixty-one HER2-positive pts were excluded. A multivariate Cox regression model selected PF generating a simple PF index. Of note, skin, lymph node, ipsi-/contra- breast, or other soft tissue involvement was scored as a single organ. Results: After a median follow-up of 20.1 months and 1171 OS events (53% of pts), median OS for the entire sample and triple-negative (TNBC) and non-TNBC subgroups was 25.2 (95% CI 23.9–26.3), 18.3 (16.3–19.7) and 27.3 (26.3–29.3) months, respectively. PF most closely associated with poorer OS were: liver mets or >2 involved organs (HR 1.6; 95% CI 1.5–1.8); DFI ≤24 months (HR 1.7; 1.5–2.0); adjuvant anthracyline and/or taxane (HR 1.1; 1.2–1.4); and TNBC (HR 1.6; 1.4–1.8). A predictive model was designed stratifying by number of PF present (0/1 vs 2 vs 3/4). The model was consistent in both TNBC and non-TNBC populations (Table). Conclusions: A PF index may estimate figures and balance arms in future trials considering OS as primary objective. A well-defined group of non-TNBC accounting for 37% of patients has an OS estimate similar to the most aggressive TNBC. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.162
GPT teacher head0.498
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207