MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2604756453

Restorying Indigenous Leadership: Wise Practices in Community Development

2015· article· en· W2604756453 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Carolyn Kenny

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of native studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCommunity Development and Social Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousContext (archaeology)Argument (complex analysis)SociologyReading (process)Political scienceEnvironmental ethicsGeographyLawArchaeologyPhilosophyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cora Voyageur, Laura Brearley, and Brian Calliou (eds.), Restorying Indigenous Leadership: Wise Practices in Community Development. Banff, AB: Banff Centre Press, 2014. 345 pages. ISBN 978-1-89473-68-3. $24.95 paperback.Voyageur, Brearley, and Calliou's edited book, Restorying Indigenous Leadership: Wise Practices in Community Development offers a scholarly look at contemporary initiatives in Indigenous in Canada, Australia, and the United States. With the exception of Brearproject. ley's chapter on Deep Listening and Michelle Evans' chapter which explores artistic in an Indigenous Australian context, the volume focuses on building, entrepreneurship, and development of business capacity. The work also focuses heavily on case study research, which is closely associated with stories based on direct experience.In the area of studies, scholars note that the concept of leadership is, in and of itself, a contested notion and based almost exclusively on context. Thus coming up with any standard definition of provides an opportunity for Indigenous scholars to focus on the context of specific tribes and nations as well as delicately to attempt to provide a theoretically sound general approach to Indigenous leadership.In the Introduction, Voyageur, Brearley, and Calliou offer a thorough review of existent Indigenous literature. This chapter should be required reading in any Indigenous course because it provides an excellent foundation for this important discourse. In Chapter One, Calliou and Wesley-Esquimaux offer a strong rationale for replacing the standard notion of best with practices. Their argument is that wise practices are more in accord with traditional knowledge systems as well as contextual applications. Throughout the entire text, we come to understand the dilemma of defining Indigenous while walking between the two worlds of traditional Indigenous values/practices/knowledge and the contemporary world, especially when it comes to politics, governance, and business.In Chapter Four, Voyageur offers a summary of Indigenous women in politics and business in Canada. This chapter is extremely timely as women begin to take on more and more roles in Indigenous communities. She writes:Indigenous women are now more directly involved in their world. They have more power and authority than they had in the past, and they are not waiting for permission to act. This new attitude allows them to bring positive change to themselves, their families, and their communities through employment, programs, and services. They are serving as role models to the youth and are giving them hope. They also serve as ambassadors to the non-Indigenous community, since success in politics and business can open many doors for future interaction. (150)Several authors take on the specific dilemmas of the strengths and limitations of the groundbreaking research coming out of the partnership between the Harvard Project on American Indian Economic De- velopment and the Native Nations Institute at the University of Arizona in which Cornell and Kalt coined the concept of nation building so popular today in the U.S., Canada, and around the world (1992). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.007
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.595
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of native studiesSame topicCommunity Development and Social ImpactFrench-language works237,207