Hydroxyurea for nontransfusion-dependent β-thalassemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Nontransfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (NTDβT) syndromes consist of β-thalassemia intermedia and moderate hemoglobin E/β thalassemias. They are characterized by varying degrees of chronic anemia and a wide spectrum of complications due to ineffective erythropoiesis and iron overload from chronic transfusions. Hydroxyurea (HU), an oral chemotherapeutic drug, is anticipated to decrease disease severity. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of HU in NTDβT patients of any age. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and major conference proceedings for studies that assessed HU in NTDβT patients were searched. Qualities of eligible studies were assessed by National Institutes of Health tools. RESULTS: Seventeen studies, collectively involving 709 patients, fulfilled the eligibility criteria. HU was associated with a significant decrease in transfusion need in severe NTDβT with complete and overall (≥50%) response rates of 42% and 79%, respectively. For mild NTDβT, HU was effective in raising hemoglobin by 1g/L in 64% of patients. CONCLUSION: HU appears to be effective, well tolerated, and associated with mild and transient adverse events. NTDβT patients may benefit from a trial of HU, although large randomized clinical trials assessing its efficacy should be conducted to confirm the findings of this meta-analysis and to assess its long-term toxicity and response sustainability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".