MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract PR21: DEK is critical for homologous recombination and its loss is synthetic lethal with DNA-PK inhibition

2017· article· en· W2604832180 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eric A. Smith, Boris Gole, Nicholas A. Willis, Krumpelbeck F. Eric, Anil G. Jegga, Abdullah Mahmood Ali, Haihong Guo, Amom Ruhikanta Meetei, Paul R. Andreassen, Ferdinand Kappes, Ralph Scully, Lisa Wiesmüller, Wells I. Susanne

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRAD51Homologous recombinationDNA repairGenome instabilitySynthetic lethalityDNADNA damageBiologyChromatinMolecular biologyCancer researchGeneticsCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract DEK is a highly conserved chromatin-bound protein whose upregulation across different cancer types directly correlates with genotoxic therapy resistance. While DEK loss induces genome instability and sensitizes cells to DNA double strand breaks (DSBs), suggesting defects in DNA repair, the role of DEK remains incompletely understood. To this end we previously determined that loss of DEK moderately attenuates non-homologous end-joining repair (NHEJ). However, the observed partial decrease in NHEJ activity is likely insufficient to fully explain the sensitivity of DEK-deficient cells to radiation and chemotherapy. Thus, we hypothesized that DEK has additional roles in DSB repair, particularly in homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair, a known contributor to chemotherapy resistance. We found that γH2AX activation and HR were strongly compromised in DEK-deficient cells, and that DEK physically interacted with and contributed to RAD51 recruitment. Thus, we hypothesized that DEK-deficient cells likely rely on residual NHEJ for repair of DSBs and survival. Correspondingly, NHEJ inhibition with DNA-PK inhibitors resulted in synthetic lethality in DEK-deficient cells. Together these findings define DEK as an important and multifunctional mediator of homologous recombination. This abstract is also being presented as Poster A09. Citation Format: Eric A. Smith, Boris Gole, Nicholas A. Willis, Krumpelbeck F. Eric, Anil G. Jegga, Abdullah M. Ali, Haihong Guo, Amom R. Meetei, Paul R. Andreassen, Ferdinand Kappes, Ralph Scully, Lisa Wiesmüller, Wells I. Susanne. DEK is critical for homologous recombination and its loss is synthetic lethal with DNA-PK inhibition [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on DNA Repair: Tumor Development and Therapeutic Response; 2016 Nov 2-5; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2017;15(4_Suppl):Abstract nr PR21.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer ResearchSame topicPARP inhibition in cancer therapyFrench-language works237,207