Frequency-Dependent Multiconductor Transmission Line Model With Collocated Voltage and Current Propagation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper reviews the classical multiconductor transmission line (MTL) equations and proposes additional constraints on these equations. A fundamental physical constraint is that the voltage and current waves must be collocated and travel together with the same propagation function. Based on this condition, the Revised Multiconductor Transmission Line (RMTL) equations are proposed. As opposed to the classical MTL equations that require complex frequency-dependent transformation matrices for their diagonalization, the RMTL equations can be diagonalized very accurately using a single real constant transformation matrix. A new Frequency-Dependent Line Model (FDLM) is proposed based on the RMTL equations. FDLM is compared with the two most accepted frequency-dependent line models in the Electromagnetic Transients Program (EMTP): The JMARTI model (fdLine) that uses a constant transformation matrix as an approximation, and the phase-coordinates Universal Line Model (ULM) that fits the frequency dependence of the transformation matrices. These time-domain models are compared with a reference frequency-domain solution for a double-circuit vertical line.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".