MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2604958213 · doi:10.1055/s-0037-1599831

Andermann Syndrome in a Pakistani Family Caused by a Novel Mutation in SLC12A6

2017· article· en· W2604958213 on OpenAlexaff
T. De Haro Muñoz, Pradeep Krishnan, Jiri Vajsar, Suzanne Laughlin, Grace Yoon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Neurology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgenesis of the corpus callosumMedicinePolyneuropathyHereditary motor and sensory neuropathyMutationGeneticsAgenesisIncidence (geometry)Corpus callosumPediatricsGenePathologyAnatomyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Agenesis of the corpus callosum with peripheral neuropathy (ACCPN) or Andermann syndrome is an autosomal recessive condition caused by mutations in SLC12A6. The neurodegenerative features are characterized primarily by severe and progressive polyneuropathy, with eventual loss of ambulation and limited lifespan. We report two siblings with Andermann syndrome from a consanguineous Pakistani family with severe global developmental delays, sensory-motor polyneuropathy, and complete agenesis of the corpus callosum, associated with a homozygous c.745+2T>A mutation in SLC12A6. This sequence change is predicted to inactivate the donor splice site and abolish correct splicing of intron 6, yielding an abnormally truncated protein. This is the first report of Andermann syndrome in patients of Pakistani origin, which supports the pan-ethnic incidence of this condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric NeurologySame topicFetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207