MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of 4-Aminopyridine on Genioglossus Muscle Activity during Sleep in Healthy Adults

2017· article· en· W2604980537 on OpenAlexaff
Luigi Taranto‐Montemurro, Scott A. Sands, Ali Azarbarzin, Melania Marques, Camila Maria de Melo, Bradley A. Edwards, Danny J. Eckert, Ludovico Messineo, David P. White, Andrew Wellman

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the American Thoracic Society · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Public Health
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Center for Research ResourcesAmerican Heart AssociationMedical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthNational Health and Medical Research CouncilHarvard CatalystAmerican Thoracic Society
KeywordsMedicineGenioglossusNon-rapid eye movement sleepAnesthesiaWakefulnessTonic (physiology)ElectromyographyInternal medicineObstructive sleep apneaEye movementPhysical medicine and rehabilitationElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale The reduction in upper airway muscle activity from wakefulness to sleep plays a key role in the development of obstructive sleep apnea. Potassium (K+) channels have been recently identified as the downstream mechanisms through which hypoglossal motoneuron membrane excitability is reduced both in non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep and REM sleep. In animal models, the administration of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP), a voltage-gated K+ channel blocker, increased genioglossus activity during wakefulness and across all sleep stages. Objectives We tested the hypothesis that administration of a single dose of 4-AP 10 mg extended release would increase genioglossus activity (electromyography of the genioglossus muscle [EMGGG]) during wakefulness and sleep, and thereby decrease pharyngeal collapsibility. Methods We performed a randomized controlled crossover proof-of-concept trial in 10 healthy participants. Participants received active treatment or placebo in randomized order 3 hours before bedtime in the physiology laboratory. Results EMGGG during wakefulness and NREM sleep and upper airway collapsibility measured during NREM sleep were unchanged between placebo and 4-AP nights. Tonic but not phasic EMGGG during REM sleep was higher on the 4-AP night when measured as a percentage of maximal voluntary activation (median [interquartile range] 0.3 [0.5] on placebo vs. 0.8 [1.9] %max on 4 AP; P = 0.04), but not when measured in μV or as a percentage of wakefulness value. Conclusions A single dose of 4-AP 10 mg extended release showed only a small increase in tonic EMGGG during REM sleep in this group of healthy subjects. We speculate that a higher dose of 4-AP may further increase EMGGG. However, given the potentially severe, dose-related adverse effects of this drug, including seizures, the administration of 4-AP does not appear to be an effective strategy to increase genioglossus activity during sleep in humans. Clinical Trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02656160).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the American Thoracic SocietySame topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207