MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A42: Identification of glutamate and aspartate ADP-ribosylation sites onto histones by mass mass spectrometry

2017· article· en· W2605040750 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jean‐Philippe Gagné, Florence Roux‐Dalvai, Daniel Defoy, Arnaud Droit, Hendzel J. Michael, Guy G. Poirier

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoneADP-ribosylationChromatinNucleosomeHistone-modifying enzymesBiochemistryChemistryHistone H2ABiologyDNAEnzymeNAD+ kinase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Chromatin structure and function is regulated by histone post-translational modifications. Histone proteins are subject to a variety of post-translational modifications that can work combinatorially to alter the transcriptional state or the repair of DNA damage. The landscape of histone modifications includes mono- and poly(ADP-ribosylation), which can directly alter nucleosome structure and DNA accessibility. ADP-ribosylation occuring on glutamate and aspartate residues was the most intensively studied histone ADP-ribosylation modification in the past, primarily because these carboxylester-type ADP-ribose–protein bonds were the most susceptible to hydroxylamine hydrolysis, a particularly fast and efficient method of protein de-ADP-ribosylation. Taking advantage of hydroxylamine-based developments in the identification of ADP-ribosylated residues by liquid-chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), we generated a repertoire of glutamate- and aspartate-specific ADP-ribosylation sites onto histones. In our study, high confidence MS/MS-assigned ADP-ribosylation site identification onto a combination of in vitro and in vivo ADP-ribosylated histones revealed that all five major classes of histones are targets for D/E ADP-ribosylation. We found that the histone tails are not the sole location of the sites of ADP-ribosylation. Significant ADP-ribosylation sites were located in central globular regions of histones adding to the complexity of the histone modification landscape. Citation Format: Jean-Philippe Gagné, Florence Roux-Dalvai, Daniel Defoy, Arnaud Droit, Hendzel J. Michael, Guy G. Poirier. Identification of glutamate and aspartate ADP-ribosylation sites onto histones by mass mass spectrometry [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on DNA Repair: Tumor Development and Therapeutic Response; 2016 Nov 2-5; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2017;15(4_Suppl):Abstract nr A42.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer ResearchSame topicPARP inhibition in cancer therapyFrench-language works237,207