MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2605119784 · doi:10.1080/01596306.2017.1306981

Representations of rural lesbian lives in young adult fiction

2017· article· en· W2605119784 on OpenAlexaff
Wendy Keys, Elizabeth Marshall, Barbara Pini

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRural development and sustainability
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueerBeautyLesbianPortraitSociologyArt historyArtGender studiesHistoryAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines representations of rural lesbian lives in three young adult novels. The novels analysed are Beauty of the broken by Tawni Waters (2014 Waters, T. (2014). Beauty of the broken. New York, NY: Simon Pulse. [Google Scholar]), Julie Anne Peters (2005 Peters, J. A. (2005). Pretend you love me. New York, NY: Little Brown. [Google Scholar]) Pretend you love me, and Forgive me if you’ve heard this one before by Karelia Stetz-Waters (2014 Stetz-Waters, K. (2014). Forgive me if you’ve heard this one before. Portland, OR: Ooligan Press. [Google Scholar]). The first of the novels by Waters (2014 Waters, T. (2014). Beauty of the broken. New York, NY: Simon Pulse. [Google Scholar]. Beauty of the broken. New York, NY: Simon Pulse) presents a very negative portrait of rural life for queer youth. Its message is that the only positive queer life is one that is lived in the urban. In contrast, the texts by Peters (2005 Peters, J. A. (2005). Pretend you love me. New York, NY: Little Brown. [Google Scholar]. Pretend you love me. New York, NY: Little Brown) and Stetz-Waters (2014 Stetz-Waters, K. (2014). Forgive me if you’ve heard this one before. Portland, OR: Ooligan Press. [Google Scholar]. Forgive me if you’ve heard this one before. Portland, OR: Ooligan Press) present rural spaces as potentially both inclusive and exclusive for queer youth. These novels also demonstrate that urban spaces can be equally problematic for queer youth. While we do not discount that Waters (2014 Waters, T. (2014). Beauty of the broken. New York, NY: Simon Pulse. [Google Scholar]. Beauty of the broken. New York, NY: Simon Pulse) description of rural life may be the experience of some queer youth, we argue that the novels by Peters (2005 Peters, J. A. (2005). Pretend you love me. New York, NY: Little Brown. [Google Scholar]. Pretend you love me. New York, NY: Little Brown) and Stetz-Waters (2014 Stetz-Waters, K. (2014). Forgive me if you’ve heard this one before. Portland, OR: Ooligan Press. [Google Scholar]. Forgive me if you’ve heard this one before. Portland, OR: Ooligan Press) offer a more nuanced and complicated notion of place and its relationship to non-normative sexual subjectivities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score0.776

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of EducationSame topicRural development and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207