MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2605165201 · doi:10.1111/ejn.13572

A single administration of the hallucinogen, 4‐acetoxy‐dimethyltryptamine, prevents the shift to a drug‐dependent state and the expression of withdrawal aversions in rodents

2017· article· en· W2605165201 on OpenAlexafffund
Héctor Vargas-Pérez, Taryn E. Grieder, Ryan Ting‐A‐Kee, Geith Maal‐Bared, Michal Chwalek, Derek van der Kooy

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Neuroscience · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsVentral tegmental areaAgonistDrugNeuroscienceHallucinogenSelf-administrationNeurotrophic factorsPharmacologyDrug withdrawalPsychologyBrain-derived neurotrophic factorReceptorMedicineInternal medicineDopamine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Despite several studies suggesting the therapeutic use of 5‐hydroxytryptamine receptors type 2A (5‐ HT 2A ) agonists in the treatment of substance use disorders, the neurobiological basis accounting for such effects are still unknown. It has been observed that chronic exposure to drugs of abuse produces molecular and cellular adaptations in ventral tegmental area ( VTA ) neurons, mediated by brain‐derived neurotrophic factor ( BDNF ). These BDNF ‐induced adaptations in the VTA are associated with the establishment of aversive withdrawal motivation that leads to a drug‐dependent state. Growing evidence suggests that 5‐ HT 2A receptor signaling can regulate the expression of BDNF in the brain. In this study, we observed that a single systemic or intra‐ VTA administration of a 5‐ HT 2A agonist in rats and mice blocks both the aversive conditioned response to drug withdrawal and the mechanism responsible for switching from a drug‐naive to a drug‐dependent motivational system. Our results suggest that 5‐ HT 2A agonists could be used as therapeutic agents to reverse a drug dependent state, as well as inhibiting the aversive effects produced by drug withdrawal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.428
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of NeuroscienceSame topicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorFrench-language works237,207