MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract IA23: Using PARP inhibitors to target ATM-deficient cancers

2017· article· en· W2605232456 on OpenAlexaffabout
Susan P. Lees‐Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOlaparibCancer researchCancerPARP inhibitorPoly ADP ribose polymeraseMedicineDNA damageBiologyPolymeraseInternal medicineGeneticsDNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) serine/threonine protein kinase plays an important role in orchestrating the cellular response to DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). Germline loss of ATM function results in Ataxia-Telangiectasia (A-T), a devastating childhood syndrome characterized by progressive loss of neuromuscular control, immune deficiency and cancer predisposition. ATM is also deleted in a large proportion of human mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and other lymphomas and recent studies have revealed that ATM is altered in many sporadic cancers including lung, colorectal, breast and prostate cancer. We previously showed that MCL and gastric cancer cell lines with deletion or mutation of ATM are sensitive to the poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, olaparib and that loss of TP53 enhances olaparib sensitivity (Williamson et al Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, 2010, 9:347-57; Williamson et al, EMBO Molecular Medicine, 2012, 4, 515-527; Kubota et al, Cell Cycle 2014, 13: 2129-37). Here we show that lung and colorectal cancers with mutation or loss of ATM are similarly sensitive to olaparib. The potential for use of PARP and ATM inhibitors in the treatment of ATM deficient malignancies will be explored. Citation Format: Susan P. Lees-Miller. Using PARP inhibitors to target ATM-deficient cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on DNA Repair: Tumor Development and Therapeutic Response; 2016 Nov 2-5; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2017;15(4_Suppl):Abstract nr IA23.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.493
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer ResearchSame topicPARP inhibition in cancer therapyFrench-language works237,207