Design and Synthesis of Mercaptoacetamides as Potent, Selective, and Brain Permeable Histone Deacetylase 6 Inhibitors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of nonhydroxamate HDAC6 inhibitors were prepared in our effort to develop potent and selective compounds for possible use in central nervous system (CNS) disorders, thus obviating the genotoxicity often associated with the hydroxamates. Halogens are incorporated in the cap groups of the designed mercaptoacetamides in order to increase brain accessibility. The indole analogue 7e and quinoline analogue 13a displayed potent HDAC6 inhibitory activity (IC 50, 11 and 2.8 nM) and excellent selectivity against HDAC1. Both 7e and 13a together with their ester prodrug 14 and disulfide prodrugs 15 and 16 were found to be effective in promoting tubulin acetylation in HEK cells. The disulfide prodrugs 15 and 16 also released a stable concentration of 7e and 13a upon microsomal incubation. Administration of 15 and 16 in vivo was found to trigger an increase of tubulin acetylation in mouse cortex. These results suggest that further exploration of these compounds for the treatment of CNS disorders is warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".