Abstract A12: CTCF facilitates DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSB) is mediated via two major pathways, non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination repair (HRR). Such repair is critical for cell survival and genome stability. Here, we report a new role for the multifunctional protein CTCF in facilitating the repair of DSB via the HRR pathway. CTCF is recruited to DSB through its zinc finger domain independently of poly(ADP-ribose) polymers catalyzed by PARP-1. CTCF ensures proper DSB repair kinetics in response to gamma-irradiation, and potentiates activation of the G2/M checkpoint. We find that CTCF regulates HRR through facilitating the recruitment of BRCA2, which is dependent on CTCF PARylation. In contrast, CTCF does not influence the recruitment, or retention, of the NHEJ protein 53BP1 to DSB. We also see that loss of CTCF is associated with hypersensitivity to DNA damaging inducing agents and inhibitors of PARP-1. Taken together, our findings establish for the first time that CTCF is an important regulator of the HRR pathway and indicate that tumors harboring hypo-PARylated CTCF may show elevated sensitivity to PARP inhibition. Citation Format: Khalid Hilmi, Chenxi Zhang, Zhenbao Yu, Amine Saad, Stephane Richard, Luke McCaffrey, Moulay A. Alaoui-Jamali, Michael Witcher. CTCF facilitates DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on DNA Repair: Tumor Development and Therapeutic Response; 2016 Nov 2-5; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2017;15(4_Suppl):Abstract nr A12.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".