MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B31: Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase 1 as a novel target for alpha-particle therapy in high-risk neuroblastoma

2017· article· en· W2605277220 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mehran Makvandi, Catherine Hou, Kuiying Xu, Redmond‐Craig Anderson, Samuel Ander-Effron, Robert H. Mach, John M. Maris, Daniel A. Pryma

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoly ADP ribose polymeraseAlpha particleVeliparibDNA damageCancer researchAlpha (finance)In vivoChromatinChemistryBiologyMolecular biologyPolymeraseDNAMedicineBiochemistryPhysicsGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase 1 (PARP-1) is the second most abundant nuclear protein next to histones and offers a unique target for the delivery of alpha emitting radionuclides directly to chromatin maximizing radiobiological effects. Alpha emitting radionuclides decay through the emission of a high linear energy transfer alpha particle that travels only 50-70 µM. This results in dense ionizations over the alpha particle track length, causing high levels of DNA double strand breaks. High-risk neuroblastoma is a deadly pediatric malignancy that overexpresses PARP-1 and approximately 80% of patients succumb to their disease. By utilizing the overexpression of PARP-1 we aim to selectively target high-risk neuroblastomas for the delivery of alpha particles to induce irreparable DNA damage and subsequent cell death. Methods: Astatine-211 was produced on a JSW BC3015 cyclotron at 28.5 MeV via the Bi-209(α,2n)At-211 nuclear reaction. Astatine-211 was isolated by dry distillation and radiochemically functionalized onto a small molecule PARP inhibitor to afford 211At-MM4. Using a panel of neuroblastoma cell lines, the pharmacology and cytotoxicity of 211At-MM4 was evaluated in vitro. Next, protein analysis was performed by Western to evaluate expression of classical and alternative non-homologous end joining proteins. In addition, PARP-1 expression and DNA damage were assessed in response to therapy. Furthermore, in vivo therapy studies with PET/CT imaging of PARP-1 were performed to assess therapeutic potential and predictive capabilities of companion diagnostics. Results: IMR-05, SK-N-SH, and NLF were the most sensitive cell lines evaluated and Be-2-c was the most resistant cell line. All cell lines evaluated were high-risk neuroblastomas and baseline Western protein analysis did not reveal specific pathway dependence for classical or alternative non-homologous end joining defined by protein expression. Response to therapy showed significant increases in DNA damage measured by gH2AX. Interestingly PARP-1 expression was upregulated post therapy in the resistant cell line Be-2-c. IMR-05 was the most sensitive cell line in vitro and was translated to in vivo models where therapeutic efficacy was shown. PET/CT imaging of PARP-1 post therapy showed low tumor uptake and was indicative of response. Conclusion: 211At-MM4 is a small molecule PARP inhibitor functionalized with an alpha emitting radionuclide astatine-211 that can effectively deliver alpha-particles to the nucleus of cancer cells. The neuroblastoma cell lines evaluated showed differential sensitivities and in vitro results translated into in vivo models. Furthermore we have characterized a novel therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma and aim for future clinical translation. Citation Format: Mehran Makvandi, Catherine Hou, Kuiying Xu, Redmond-Craig Anderson, Samuel Ander-Effron, Robert H. Mach, John M. Maris, Daniel A. Pryma. Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase 1 as a novel target for alpha-particle therapy in high-risk neuroblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on DNA Repair: Tumor Development and Therapeutic Response; 2016 Nov 2-5; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2017;15(4_Suppl):Abstract nr B31.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer ResearchSame topicNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207