MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2605319976

The Role of Serotonin Availability in the Rat Insular Cortex on Conditioned Disgust and Conditioned Taste Avoidance

2013· dissertation· en· W2605319976 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Katharine J. Tuerke

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsScholarshipDisgustTastePsychologyTaste aversionSocial psychologyPolitical scienceNeuroscienceAnger
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although the neural mechanisms regulating vomiting are well understood, the neurobiology of nausea is not. Unlike conditioned taste avoidance (CTA), conditioned disgust (indicated by orofacial gaping reactions) is a model of nausea-induced behaviour in rats because it is selectively produced by emetic drugs and anti-emetics attenuate it. Treatments that reduce serotonin (5-HT) availability selectively interfere with conditioned gaping (Limebeer and Parker, 2000; 2003) and forebrain serotonin is critical for the production of disgust reactions (Grill and Norgren, 1978b; Limebeer et al., 2004). The insular cortex (IC) is a site of taste-illness associations and is involved in the sensation of nausea and vomiting in humans (Penfield and Faulk, 1955; Fiol et al., 1988; Catenoix et al., 2008) and other animals (Kaada, 1951; Contreras et al., 2007). Therefore, we investigated the relationship between serotonin, conditioned gaping and CTA in the insular cortex. \nSystemic pretreatment with the classic anti-emetic ondansetron (OND) reduced both LiCl-induced unconditioned malaise (assessed by lying on belly) and conditioned gaping reactions, without modifying CTA. These experiments demonstrate that decreases in serotonin availability interfere with conditioned gaping and unconditioned malaise as well as provide further evidence of the validity of the conditioned gaping model.\nRats with bilateral NMDA lesions of the agranular IC showed attenuated CTA learning but conditioned gaping reactions were unaffected. This finding suggests that the agranular IC, a site of gustatory input, may be required for CTA learning.\nPartial serotonergic depletion of the IC attenuated conditioned gaping reactions, suggesting that serotonin in the IC is required to establish conditioned gaping. A double dissociation in the regulation of disgust and taste avoidance, by selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonism/agonism in the visceral (granular) IC and the gustatory (agranular) IC was observed. Infusion of OND into the visceral IC attenuated conditioned gaping but spared CTA. Additionally, administration of the 5-HT3 receptor agonist m-chlorophenylbiguanide (mCPBG) enhanced LiCl-induced conditioned gaping reactions (which was prevented by intracranial administration of OND), but spared CTA. In contrast, intracranial OND pretreatment in the gustatory IC attenuated CTA and mCPBG infusions produced CTA, but neither affected the nausea-induced behaviour of conditioned gaping.\nTogether, these studies shed light on the neurobiology of nausea. These results suggest that 5-HT activity (at the 5-HT3 receptor) in the visceral IC may selectively produce the nausea-induced reactions of conditioned disgust, while activity in the gustatory IC may be involved in the production of CTA learning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207