MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2605359308 · doi:10.1117/1.jbo.22.4.045004

Shape-based reconstruction for transrectal diffuse optical tomography monitoring of photothermal focal therapy of prostate cancer: simulation studies

2017· article· en· W2605359308 on OpenAlexafffund
Robert Weersink, Sahil Chaudhary, Kenwrick Mayo, Jie He, Brian C. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomedical Optics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchTerry Fox Research Institute
KeywordsPhotothermal therapyTomographyProstate cancerProstateLesionOpticsMaterials scienceDiffuse optical imagingOptical tomographyMedicinePhysicsCancerPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop and demonstrate a simple shape-based approach for diffuse optical tomographic reconstruction of coagulative lesions generated during interstitial photothermal therapy (PTT) of the prostate. The shape-based reconstruction assumes a simple ellipsoid shape, matching the general dimensions of a cylindrical diffusing fiber used for light delivery in current clinical studies of PTT in focal prostate cancer. The specific requirement is to accurately define the border between the photothermal lesion and native tissue as the photothermal lesion grows, with an accuracy of ? 1 ?? mm , so treatment can be terminated before there is damage to the rectal wall. To demonstrate the feasibility of the shape-based diffuse optical tomography reconstruction, simulated data were generated based on forward calculations in known geometries that include the prostate, rectum, and lesions of varying dimensions. The only source of optical contrast between the lesion and prostate was increased scattering in the lesion, as is typically observed with coagulation. With noise added to these forward calculations, lesion dimensions were reconstructed using the shape-based method. This approach for reconstruction is shown to be feasible and sufficiently accurate for lesions that are within 4 mm from the rectal wall. The method was also robust for irregularly shaped lesions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.705
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biomedical OpticsSame topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207