Abstract A24: A genome-wide RNAi screen identifies synthetic lethality of CX-5461 with homologous recombination repair deficiency in ovarian cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Cancer is characterized by deregulated cell growth and proliferation, both of which are associated with hyperactivation of ribosome biogenesis. Inhibition of ribosome biogenesis using CX-5461, a specific inhibitor of RNA polymerase I-dependent transcription, has shown therapeutic efficacy in a MYC driven B-cell lymphoma mouse model, which is enhanced when used in combination with the mTORC1 inhibitor Everolimus. However, the therapeutic potential of CX-5461 in solid cancers is yet to be determined. Our preliminary data utilizing a panel of 36 ovarian cancer (OVCA) cell lines suggest that acute CX-5461 treatment results in cell cycle arrest and does not induce apoptosis. We hypothesize that the identification of genes that can be targeted to cooperate with CX-5461 will define novel drug combinations for the improved treatment of OVCA. Therefore, we performed a genome-wide RNAi screen to identify synthetic lethal genes with CX-5461 in the high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) cell line OVCAR4. Pathway enrichment analysis of the candidate hits showed significant enrichment in the homologous recombination DNA repair (HR) pathway. Synergy with CX-5461 was validated in multiple HGSOC cell lines by both genetic and pharmacological inhibition of HR pathway components. We are currently investigating the mechanism of this synergy and will further assess efficacy in vivo. As HR deficiency is observed in 20% of OVCA patients, we suggest that future application of our studies will lead to new therapeutic options to improve the survival of this cohort of patients. Citation Format: Shunfei Yan, Keefe T. Chan, Kaylene J. Simpson, Elaine Sanij, Karen E. Sheppard, Katherine M. Hannan, Ross D. Hannan, Richard B. Pearson. A genome-wide RNAi screen identifies synthetic lethality of CX-5461 with homologous recombination repair deficiency in ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on DNA Repair: Tumor Development and Therapeutic Response; 2016 Nov 2-5; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2017;15(4_Suppl):Abstract nr A24.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".