PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PENILAIAN BERBASIS KELAS UNTUK PEMBELAJARAN KIMIA SEKOLAH MENENGAH ATAS POKOK BAHASAN STOIKIOMETRI
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the causes that classroom-based assessment has not been applied in Senior High School nowadays because most of chemistry teachers have difficulties to develop the desired assessment as needed at the educational unit level curriculum. To solve this problem, a research was done to develop classroom-based assessment tool that is valid, practical, and effective for chemistry learning material in stoichiometry on Senior High School. The research method used was a development research. Research activities were conducted three years consisting of three stages, namely front-back analysis,prototyping, and implementation. Date were collected throught classroom observations, interviews with students, teachers, chemistry education expert,student work analysis, and achievement test. The result of first year showed that classroom-based assessment tool developed showed the validity criteria in term of its content and construction. The implementation conducted in the second year in SMAN 1 Pekanbaru, SMA Babussalam, and SMAN 2 Siak Hulu. The implementation result also showed the practical criteria, meaning that students and teachers can use it without significant constaint.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it