MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2605444380 · doi:10.1093/europace/eux044

Sudden cardiac death in adults with congenital heart disease: does QRS-complex fragmentation discriminate in structurally abnormal hearts?

2017· article· en· W2605444380 on OpenAlexaff
Jim T. Vehmeijer, Zeliha Koyak, Jouke P. Bokma, Werner Budts, Louise Harris, Barbara J.M. Mulder, Joris R. de Groot

Bibliographic record

VenueEP Europace · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsToronto General Hospital
FundersNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekZonMw
KeywordsCardiologyInternal medicineQRS complexMedicineHeart diseaseSudden cardiac deathFragmentation (computing)Biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) causes a large portion of all mortality in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients. However, identification of high-risk patients remains challenging. Fragmented QRS-complexes (fQRS) are a marker for SCD in patients with acquired heart disease but data in ACHD patients are lacking. We therefore aim to evaluate the prognostic value of fQRS for SCD in ACHD patients. Methods and results: From a multicentre cohort of 25 790 ACHD patients, we included tachyarrhythmic SCD cases (n = 147), and controls (n = 266) matched by age, gender, congenital defect and (surgical) intervention. fQRS was defined as ≥1 discontinuous deflection in narrow QRS-complexes, and ≥2 in wide QRS-complexes (>120 ms), in two contiguous ECG leads. We calculated odds ratios (OR) using univariable and multivariable conditional logistic regression models correcting for impaired systemic ventricular function, heart failure and QRS duration >120 ms. ECGs of 147 SCD cases (65% male, median age of death 34 years) and of 266 controls were assessed. fQRS was present in 51% of cases and 34% of controls (OR 2.0, P = 0.003). In multivariable analysis, fQRS was independently associated with SCD (OR 1.9, P = 0.01). The most common diagnose of SCD cases was tetralogy of Fallot (ToF, 34 cases). In ToF, fQRS was present in 71% of cases vs. 43% of controls (OR for SCD 2.8, P = 0.03). Conclusions: fQRS was independently associated with SCD in ACHD patients in a cohort of SCD patients and matched controls. fQRS may therefore contribute to the decision when evaluating ACHD patients for primary prevention of SCD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEP EuropaceSame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207