MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2605607505 · doi:10.23889/ijpds.v1i1.32

Using Canadian data linkage to investigate the socioeconomic patterning of hospital burden for childbirth

2017· article· en· W2605607505 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sarah M Mah, Claudia Sanmartin, Michelle Rotermann, Saeeda Khan, Sam Harper, Nancy A. Ross

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Population Data Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsStatistics CanadaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChildbirthMedicineSocioeconomic statusVaginal deliveryRecord linkageDemographyHousehold incomePopulationHealth careMedical recordPregnancyEnvironmental healthEmergency medicineObstetricsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACTObjectivesBirth and delivery in hospital is one of the most common medical procedures in Canadian hospitals, and can be used to assess equity in the delivery of health care. This study investigates the association between socioeconomic status and hospital burden for childbirth using linked Canadian survey and administrative databases, accounting for a wide array of other individual and health-care related characteristics.
 ApproachA population-based record linkage between national health survey data and the Canadian Discharge Abstract Database (a census of all Canadian hospital separations) allowed the tracking of hospital utilization between 2005 and 2009 for which individual-level socioeconomic and demographic factors were also available. Length of stay for delivery, risk of pre-delivery hospitalization within 30 days of admission for delivery, and risk of maternal readmission within 30 days of discharge for delivery were the three measures of hospital utilization modeled.
 ResultsComplete information for 7,163 deliveries of 5,568 women was available and used in the models of length of stay and risk of maternal admission pre- and post-delivery. In fully adjusted models, predicted length of stay was graded by household income with longest stays for lowest income women (2.79 days, 95% CI 2.61-2.92), followed by middle income women (2.63 days, 95% CI 2.50-2.76) and high income women (2.56 days, 95% CI 2.49-2.63). Factors intrinsic to routine hospital care and protocol such as province and vaginal versus Cesarean section delivery were stronger predictors of length of stay than income. Additionally, Aboriginal status, compounded with residing in a rural setting was associated with higher predicted probability of maternal readmission.
 ConclusionsLow income women have marginally longer stays in hospital following birth events than do middle and high-income women in Canada that persist after adjustment for strong drivers of length of stay (parity and birth mode). While this may suggest that more complicated cases are benefiting from longer stays in hospital, it provokes the question as to whether there may be additional reductions in length of stay that could be achieved through resource redistribution to the prenatal period. Overall, the results suggest that equity goals of the Canadian health care system are being achieved for birth-related hospitalizations, and the availability of these linked data will be key for further comprehensive evaluation of population health status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Population Data ScienceSame topicGlobal Maternal and Child HealthFrench-language works237,207