Four sympatrically nesting auks show clear resource segregation in their foraging environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MEPS Marine Ecology Progress Series Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsTheme Sections MEPS 572:243-254 (2017) - DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12144 Four sympatrically nesting auks show clear resource segregation in their foraging environment Isabeau Pratte1,*, Gregory J. Robertson2, Mark L. Mallory1 1Department of Biology, Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia B4P 2R6, Canada 2Wildlife Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Mount Pearl, Newfoundland A1N 4T3, Canada *Corresponding author: pratteisabeau@gmail.com ABSTRACT: Auks share ecological similarities and are often found in sympatrically nesting assemblages at suitable nesting sites. It is expected that co-existing species would have evolved strategies to reduce niche overlap in response to resource competition. The presence of Atlantic puffins Fratercula arctica, razorbills Alca torda, thick-billed murres Uria lomvia and common murres U. aalge at the Gannet Islands, Labrador, is an opportunity to study interspecific interactions in a major seabird community. We compared the foraging movements of adult breeding birds and the diet of the birds inferred through (1) stable isotopes in the blood of adults, and (2) prey delivered to the chicks, as dimensions in the foraging niche among these 4 auks. Our results revealed that puffins and thick-billed murres headed offshore to forage, while razorbills and common murres were more coastal, heading towards mainland Labrador. The patterns of spatial segregation found among coastal and pelagic birds were mirrored by their stable isotope ratios, with one group of species foraging at a higher trophic level of an inshore food web and the other foraging on a lower trophic level of an offshore, pelagic food web. The 'pelagic' species segregated by prey choice for their chicks while differential alternate prey selection was the source of segregation between the 'coastal' species. Our research highlights the importance of segregation patterns in both spatial and diet dimensions of the foraging niche among the 4 auks—a potential mechanism for reducing interspecific competition among ecologically similar seabirds and explaining the persistence of such seabird assemblages through time. KEY WORDS: Seabird · Foraging distribution · Niche overlap · Diet · Isotopic niche Full text in pdf format Supplementary material PreviousNextCite this article as: Pratte I, Robertson GJ, Mallory ML (2017) Four sympatrically nesting auks show clear resource segregation in their foraging environment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 572:243-254. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12144 Export citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in MEPS Vol. 572. Online publication date: May 31, 2017 Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599 Copyright © 2017 Inter-Research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".