Prediction of milk fatty acid content with mid-infrared spectroscopy in Canadian dairy cattle using differently distributed model development sets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fatty acid profile of milk is a prevailing issue due to the potential negative or positive effects of different fatty acids to human health and nutrition. Mid-infrared spectroscopy can be used to obtain predictions of otherwise costly fatty acid phenotypes in a widespread and rapid manner. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prediction of fatty acid content for the Canadian dairy cattle population from mid-infrared spectral data and to compare the results produced by altering the partial least squares (PLS) model development set used. The PLS model development sets used to develop the predictions were reference fatty acids expressed as (1) grams per 100 g of fatty acid, (2) grams per 100 g of milk, (3) the natural logarithmic transform of grams per 100 g of milk, and (4) subsets of samples randomly selected by removing excess records around the mean to present a more uniform distribution, repeated 10 times. Gas chromatography measured fatty acid concentration and spectral data for 2,023 milk samples of 373 cows from 4 breeds and 44 herds were used in the model development. The coefficient of determination of cross-validation ( R cv 2 ) increased when fatty acids were expressed on a per 100 g of milk basis compared with on a per 100 g of fat basis for all examined fatty acids. The logarithmic transformation used to create a more Gaussian distribution in the development set had little effect on the prediction accuracy. The individual fatty acids C12:0, C14:0, C16:0, C18:0, C18:1n-9 cis , and saturated, monounsaturated, unsaturated, short-chain, medium-chain, and long-chain fatty acid groups had ( R cv 2 ) greater than 0.70. When model development was performed with subsets of the original samples, slight increases in ( R cv 2 ) values were observed for the majority of fatty acids. The difference in ( R cv 2 ) between the top- and bottom-performing prediction equation across the different subsets for a single predicted fatty acid was on average 0.055 depending on which samples were randomly selected to be used in the PLS model development set. Predictions for fatty acids with high accuracies can be used to monitor fatty acid contents for cows in milk recording programs and possibly for genetic evaluation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".