MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2606047366 · doi:10.3168/jds.2016-12102

Prediction of milk fatty acid content with mid-infrared spectroscopy in Canadian dairy cattle using differently distributed model development sets

2017· article· en· W2606047366 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Dairy CommissionDairy Farmers of Canada
KeywordsFatty acidPartial least squares regressionPopulationDairy cattleFood scienceBovine milkChemistryAnimal scienceBiologyMathematicsBiochemistryStatisticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fatty acid profile of milk is a prevailing issue due to the potential negative or positive effects of different fatty acids to human health and nutrition. Mid-infrared spectroscopy can be used to obtain predictions of otherwise costly fatty acid phenotypes in a widespread and rapid manner. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prediction of fatty acid content for the Canadian dairy cattle population from mid-infrared spectral data and to compare the results produced by altering the partial least squares (PLS) model development set used. The PLS model development sets used to develop the predictions were reference fatty acids expressed as (1) grams per 100 g of fatty acid, (2) grams per 100 g of milk, (3) the natural logarithmic transform of grams per 100 g of milk, and (4) subsets of samples randomly selected by removing excess records around the mean to present a more uniform distribution, repeated 10 times. Gas chromatography measured fatty acid concentration and spectral data for 2,023 milk samples of 373 cows from 4 breeds and 44 herds were used in the model development. The coefficient of determination of cross-validation R cv 2 ( ) increased when fatty acids were expressed on a per 100 g of milk basis compared with on a per 100 g of fat basis for all examined fatty acids. The logarithmic transformation used to create a more Gaussian distribution in the development set had little effect on the prediction accuracy. The individual fatty acids C12:0, C14:0, C16:0, C18:0, C18:1n-9 cis, and saturated, monounsaturated, unsaturated, short-chain, medium-chain, and long-chain fatty acid groups had R cv 2 greater than 0.70. When model development was performed with subsets of the original samples, slight increases in R cv 2 values were observed for the majority of fatty acids. The difference in R cv 2 between the topand bottom-performing prediction equation across the different subsets for a single predicted fatty acid was on average 0.055 depending on which samples were randomly selected to be used in the PLS model development set. Predictions for fatty acids with high accuracies can be used to monitor fatty acid contents for cows in milk recording programs and possibly for genetic evaluation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.831

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it