MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2606116059 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2015.127

Understanding the natural history of adult temporal lobe epilepsy

2015· article· en· W2606116059 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Lizbeth Hernández‐Ronquillo, JF Tellez-Zenteno, Samantha Buckley, L Ladino-Malagon

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsSaskatoon Medical Imaging
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpilepsyTemporal lobeMedicineRetrospective cohort studyCohortEpilepsy surgeryPediatricsNatural historySurgeryInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common type of epilepsy in adults. The literature in this field supports the notion than many patients become candidates for surgery and little is known about the group of patients who do not require surgical treatment. This is a retrospective cohort study that included all patients with TLE assessed and followed by the Saskatchewan Epilepsy Program since 2007. Mild course was defined as patients not having seizures, using or not AEDs at last follow up. Severe course of TLE was considered in patients with continuous seizures and patients who had epilepsy surgery. Descriptive statistics were used. OR and CI were calculated. One hundred and fifty nine patients were included. Age of patients at last follow up was 46.04 + 14.4 (range 19-88) years. Mean follow up of patients was 43.46+ 22.6 (6 to 84) months. Fourth six patients (29%) were seizure-free with AEDS (mild course TLE) and 113 (61%) had severe course of TLE. Patients with mild course of TLE were older (p 0.002), with a late onset of epilepsy (p< 0.001) and their epilepsy evolution was shorter (p<0.001). Our study shows that not all the patients with TLE require surgery and that a fair percentage of patients can be controlled with medication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicEpilepsy research and treatment→French-language works237,207→