MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2606145752 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2015.250

2. SUMO1-CDK6 conjugation drives the cell cycle and retains the self renewal of glioblastoma stem cells

2015· article· en· W2606145752 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Anita C. Bellail

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyclin-dependent kinase 6SUMO proteinCyclin-dependent kinaseCell biologyCell cycleChemistryStem cellUbiquitinBiologyCancer researchCellBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current concept in the cell cycle stipulates that constant synthesis without coupled ubiquitin- mediated proteolysis maintains the levels of cyclin-dependent kinase proteins through the cell cycle. CDK proteins are elevated in glioblastoma, which has long been thought due to gene amplifications, although the amplifications occur only in a small set of the tumors according to the genome. In this study, we show that the G1 phase CDK6 is a substrate of both ubiquitin and small ubiquitin-like modifier-1 (SUMO1), and that CDK6 is sumoylated due to the elevated activity of SUMO1 conjugation in glioblastoma. CDK6 sumoylation at Lys 216 structurally blocks the access of ubiquitination molecules to the Lys 147 ubiquitination site; thus, CDK6 sumoylation stabilize the protein, maintains the kinase activity and drives the cell cycle through G1/S transition. Inhibition of SUMO1 conjugation causes G1 arrest and abolishes the self-renewal and tumorigenic property of glioblastoma initiating or stem cells. In conclusion, SUMO1-CDK6 conjugation constitutes a new mechanism of cell cycle control and selective inhibition of SUMO1 conjugation may provide a novel strategy for the development of the cancer stem cells-targeted treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways→French-language works237,207→