MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An emergent functional parcellation of the temporal cortex

2017· review· en· W2606214056 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Rebecca L. Jackson, Claude J. Bajada, Grace E. Rice, Lauren Cloutman, Matthew A. Lambon Ralph

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Music Perception
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilMedical Research Council Canada
KeywordsTemporal lobeTemporal cortexFusiform gyrusMiddle temporal gyrusModality (human–computer interaction)NeurosciencePsychologyAuditory cortexComputer scienceCognitionArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The temporal lobe has been associated with various cognitive functions which include memory, auditory cognition and semantics. However, at a higher level of conceptualisation, all of the functions associated with the temporal lobe can be considered as lying along one major axis; from modality-specific to modality-general processing. This paper used a spectral reordering technique on resting-state and task-based functional data to extract the major organisational axis of the temporal lobe in a bottom-up, data-driven fashion. Independent parcellations were performed on resting-state scans from 71 participants and active semantic task scans from 23 participants acquired using dual echo gradient echo planar imaging in order to preserve signal in inferior temporal cortex. The resulting organisational axis was consistent (over dataset and hemisphere) and progressed from superior temporal gyrus and posterior inferior temporal cortex to ventrolateral anterior temporal cortex. A hard parcellation separated a posterior (superior temporal and posterior fusiform and inferior temporal gyri) and an anterior cluster (ventrolateral anterior temporal lobe). The functional connectivity of the hard clusters supported the hypothesis that the connectivity gradient separated modality-specific and modality-general regions. This hypothesis was then directly tested by performing a VOI analysis upon an independent semantic task-based data set including auditory and visually presented stimuli. This confirmed that the ventrolateral anterior aspects of the temporal lobe are associated with modality-general processes whilst posterior and superior aspects are specific to certain modalities, with the posterior inferior subregions involved in visual processes and superior regions involved in audition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.748

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.284
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.122 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations114
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroImageSame topicNeuroscience and Music PerceptionFrench-language works237,207