On the Relationship Between Children’s Social Development and Their Class Conditions at Kindergarten in the Undeveloped Region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The research purpose is to know the relationship between children’s social development and the class-condition of kindergarten. Research methods are the questionnaire investigation and interview method. The class-condition of 54 classes is overall measured by questionnaire investigation for some preschool education group in Yanbian County of Sichuan province, in China. The social development of 30 children is known by observation and interview method in the same preschool education group. The obtained data is processed by SPSS.22 in the PC. The results of the study are that: (a) Most of the children’s social development is good, especially in the aspect of social interaction and self control; but most of the children have not still formed good habits. (b) Most of the classes in the kindergarten do well nurse in daily life, curriculum classes and children’s development evaluation; but there is shortage in the decorating wall among most of the classes in kindergarten. (c) It is analyzed by stepwise regression for the social development of children including each factor as the dependent variable and each factor among class-conditions of the kindergarten as the independent variable. The result shows that nursing in daily life and decorating wall entered the regression equation. It is clear that nursing in daily life and the decorating wall have important influence on children’s social development. The conclusions are that teachers should pay attention to the cultivation of the children’s good habits; that teachers should strengthen the decorating wall in class; that teachers should look at the class everyday life care as an important part of the job.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".