Genetic Counselors: An Important Resource for Families following a Young Sudden Cardiac Death
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sudden cardiac death is a tragic result of a number of cardiovascular diseases. While the majority of sudden cardiac death cases are in older individuals with coronary artery disease, victims also include younger people (those less than 40 years old). At least 40% of cases of young sudden death are attributable to genetic causes, including diagnoses such as long QT syndrome and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. In 50% of young sudden death cases, there are no warning signs or family history of sudden death. These young sudden deaths are a tragedy for families and in many cases are devastating for communities as well. Awareness is spreading among medical examiners and cardiologists on how to assess and treat these families but few healthcare providers see cases routinely. The combination of an unexpected death and the burden of potentially having a genetic disease themselves leaves family members in a vulnerable and often overwhelming position. Genetic counselors, particularly those who specialize in cardiovascular disease, are uniquely qualified to help surviving family members navigate the medical and psychosocial issues present in these cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it