General paediatric inpatient deaths over a 15-year period
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively review trends of general paediatric inpatient deaths at a tertiary care children's hospital over a 15-year period. METHODS: Data were collected for all patients who died on the general paediatric wards or paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) during 1998, 2005 or 2012 and had a 'general paediatric condition'-an underlying condition or diagnosis that would normally result in admission to a general paediatric ward. Data were related to: demographics, health services utilization, information about provision and orders related to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) at time of death and involvement of palliative care services. RESULTS: Eighty-five inpatients met inclusion criteria: 35 in 1998, 27 in 2005 and 23 in 2012. Nearly 95% of general paediatric patients who died in 1998 did so in the PICU, 59.3% in 2005 and 69.6% in 2012. The median age of death decreased from 3 years in 1998 to 2 years in 2012. The proportion of patients with 'no CPR' orders at time of death increased from 31.4% in 1998 to 87.0% in 2012. Similarly, the proportion of patients with palliative care team involvement prior to death increased from less than 10% in 1998 to 73.9% in 2012. CONCLUSIONS: The absolute number of inpatient general paediatric deaths has decreased from 1998 to 2012 at this hospital. A larger proportion of these deaths are occurring on the general paediatric wards rather than in the PICU over time. 'No CPR' orders and palliative care consultations are becoming more prevalent in these patients prior to death.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".