MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2606407955 · doi:10.1039/c7mt00040e

Glutathione binding to dirhodium tetraacetate: a spectroscopic, mass spectral and computational study of an anti-tumour compound

2017· article· en· W2606407955 on OpenAlex
Daisy L. Wong, Angel Zhang, Abayomi S. Faponle, Sam P. de Visser, Martin J. Stillman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMetallomics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMetal complexes synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaRoyal Society of ChemistryGovernment of Ontario
KeywordsGlutathioneChemistryThioetherTripeptideStereochemistryRhodiumCircular dichroismElectrospray ionizationCovalent bondIn vivoMass spectrometryBiochemistryOrganic chemistryEnzymeAmino acidCatalysisChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glutathione (γ-l-glutamyl-l-cysteinyl-glycine) is a ubiquitous tripeptide found in all plants and animals. Glutathione has key roles as a metallochaperone and as a cellular thiol involved in metabolism. Little is known about how glutathione interacts with organometallic compounds in vivo. Here, we report the reactions of glutathione in vitro with dirhodium(ii) tetraacetate (tetrakis(μ-acetato)dirhodium(ii), Rh2(OAc)4), a compound with anti-tumour properties. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, UV-Visible absorption and circular dichroism spectroscopic methods were used to determine the stoichiometries and optical properties of the final conjugate. Computational analyses were used to predict the binding modes of glutathione to the Rh2(OAc)4, and report on the orbital assignments for the resulting products. We explored the competition by GSH for methionine-bound axial sites on Rh2(OAc)4 to investigate the use of weak thioether to protect its cellular-based anti-cancer activity. Our study highlights the important role that axial ligation would play in deactivating or significantly decreasing the efficacy of this bimetallic anti-tumor drug. The computational data explain the stability of the mono-adduct and the appearance of new absorption bands in the UV region including retention of the Rh–Rh single bond. Additionally, these data show that glutathione can effectively disable the potency of these metallo-drugs through orbital overlap of the entire Rh–Rh core as a result of the strong binding. Electronic absorption spectroscopy, mass spectrometry and computational analysis are a powerful combination in understanding possible chemical reactions in vivo and this information can be used to synthetically tune dirhodium complexes for use in the fight against cancer. Glutathione attacks the axial site of the anti-tumor complex Rh2(OAc)4 and the Rh–Rh bond is retained. This is observed with ESI-MS, CD and UV-Vis spectroscopy, and explained with DFT calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.643

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it