MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Memory ILC2s and type 2 lung inflammation

2016· article· en· W2606868180 on OpenAlexaff
Itziar Martínez-González, Laura Mathae, Maryam Gahedi, Catherine A. Steer, Grace F. T. Poon, Fumio Takei

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicIL-33, ST2, and ILC Pathways
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInnate lymphoid cellImmunologyInflammationAllergic inflammationLungInterleukin 33Memory T cellLymphatic systemAllergenBiologyMedicineT cellCytokineAllergyImmune systemInnate immune systemInterleukinInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) are critical mediators of allergic lung inflammation. Upon protease allergen encounter, epithelial-derived IL-33 activates ILC2s to produce large amounts of type 2 inflammatory cytokines. ILC2-derived cytokines induce T helper 2 (Th2) cell-independent allergic lung inflammation. Upon activation a subset of lung ILC2s becomes long-lived memory cells. Memory ILC2s are more sensitive and respond stronger to unrelated allergen encounters. Gene expression analysis and transfer experiments show that the high responsiveness is due to intrinsic changes in memory ILC2s. Indeed, memory ILC2s not only respond to IL-33 but also become responsive to the alarmin IL-25. Finally, memory ILC2s promote early Th2 differentiation in the draining lymph node, which leads to a stronger memory T cell response. On the other hand, the generation and maintenance of memory ILC2s is T-cell independent. Understanding the regulation of memory ILC2s may lead to the development of novel therapies for allergic diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicIL-33, ST2, and ILC PathwaysFrench-language works237,207