MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2606910847 · doi:10.1139/cjas-2016-0212

Ruminal pH, short-chain fatty acid concentrations, and serum acute phase protein concentrations during finishing for steers with and without rumen and liver pathology

2017· article· en· W2606910847 on OpenAlexaffvenue
B. Wiese, John Campbell, S. Hendrick, Greg B Penner

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Animal Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsLethbridge CollegeUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRumenAnimal scienceAcute-phase proteinSerum amyloid ASilageFermentationBiologyChemistryInternal medicineBiochemistryMedicineInflammation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study was carried out to determine whether ruminal fermentation and serum acute phase protein concentrations differed between steers with and without pathology at slaughter. Ruminally cannulated steers (n = 28) were housed with noncannulated steers (n = 250) and randomly assigned to one of eight pens. Steers were previously adapted to a diet containing 5% barley silage and 95% concentrate. Ruminal pH was measured continuously and ruminal fluid and blood samples were collected weekly. Steers were slaughtered and those with a liver score (A or A+) or a rumen score of 2 or 3 (ulceration or scarring) were classified as pathology (PATH) and compared with those with no pathology (NOPATH). Steers with PATH spent 182 min d−1 more with pH < 5.8 (P = 0.05) and 64 min d−1 more time with pH < 5.2 (P = 0.03) than NOPATH. The concentration of serum amyloid A was greater for steers with PATH than NOPATH (P = 0.02) and haptaglobin tended (P = 0.08) to be greater. Overall, results of the current study suggest that the duration of time that ruminal pH is <5.2 and a serum acute phase protein response are greater for steers with a case definition including ruminal and liver lesions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Animal ScienceSame topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207