Adhérence des réparations en béton: concepts, facteurs d'influence et évaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Qui ne doute pas acquiert peu Léonardo da VinciLes 15 ans de coopération entre des chercheurs du CRIB à l'Université Laval et du Département ArGEnCo à l'Université de Liège reposent sur un intérêt commun dans le domaine de l'entretien et la maintenance de nos infrastructures civiles et industrielles.C'est vraiment à partir de 2000 que les deux groupes de recherche, avec l'appui de leurs gouvernements respectifs et le support des Professeurs Michel PIGEON et Robert DEGEIMBRE, ont effectivement commencé à développer des projets de recherche en commun et à favoriser les échanges d'étudiants, de chercheurs et d'enseignants.Période féconde s'il en est, puisque plusieurs fois par an, nous nous sommes rencontrés pour travailler, rédiger, mesurer, etc., mais aussi créer un réseau amical et sympathique entre nos groupes de recherche, terreau indispensable à l'approfondissement de nos connaissances intellectuelles, mais aussi humaines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.216 | 0.546 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.019 | 0.015 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".