Artistic Innovation Development in the Management of Cultural, Traditional, and Festival Tourisms at Phu Hin Rong Kla, Phu Thab Boek, and Khao Khor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current research involves the development of artistic innovation in the management of cultural, traditional, and festival tourisms at Phu Hin Rong Kla, Phu Thab Boek, and Khao Khor. It aims to investigate the body of knowledge about the cultural, traditional, and festival tourist attractions in these three destinations; examines the potential of communities in developing tourism routes; develop and evaluates the development of artistic innovation in tourism management. The researcher employed a mixed-methods approach which include a survey research of the communities within the 3 targeted areas, a qualitative investigation by means of observing the community participation, an in-depth interview, and social interaction as public network. The methodology includes an analysis of local database system, the development of a public model for an analysis of relation system, knowledge development of community people, relationship network, and the dynamics of community culture that supports tourism in the communities within the areas of Phu Hin Rong Kla, Phu Thab Boek, and Khao Khor. These 3 areas cover 2 provinces, 3 districts, 11 sub-districts, and 131 villages. The development of artistic innovation in tourism management comprises 4 aspects namely: 1) Knowledge management includes electronic database system, E-Books and tourism documents; 2) Development of products and souvenirs includes survey and selection of community products and souvenirs, designing products and souvenirs, bazaar festival, and printed materials; 3) Public relations includes tourism guidebook, tourism maps and pamphlets, public relations through radio and TV, and printed materials; 4) Aesthetic value includes documentary film, songs, documentary photo book, Art Workshop, commercial ads, and Land Art. The summary results of evaluation of the overall quality by interviewing with 80 tourists and experts of tourism and art, suggested that the development of artistic innovation in the 3 aspects, i.e. knowledge management, public relations, and values were at a very high level, and development of products and souvenir was at a high level. An evaluation of tourists’ satisfaction towards the project operation was conducted using a questionnaire with a sample of 2,000 persons at post-implementation of the project and sub-activities. The results of evaluation suggested tourists’ satisfaction at a high level (X = 4.17, sd = 0.81); income at a high level (X = 4.56, sd = 0.81); and increased number of tourists at a highest level (X = 4.54, sd = 0.81).The results also indicated that the artistic innovation on public relations can serve to draw the attention of tourists to visit particular tourist attractions for their aesthetic value, distinctive uniqueness, cultural, traditional, and historical significances, landscape, climate, way of life, and festivals in each area. More useful information include telephone number, website, maps, transportation, tourism information center, geographical and climatic conditions, and warning and alarm in each of the tourism attractions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".