Visually evoked changes in the rat retinal blood flow measured with Doppler optical coherence tomography (Conference Presentation)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Visually evoked changes of retinal blood flow can serve as an important research tool to investigate eye disease such as glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy. In this study we used a combined, research-grade, high-resolution Doppler OCT+ERG system to study changes in the retinal blood flow (RBF) and retinal neuronal activity in response to visual stimuli of different intensities, durations and type (flicker vs single flash). Specifically, we used white light stimuli of 10 ms and 200 ms single flash, 1s and 2s for flickers stimuli of 20% duty cycle. The study was conducted in-vivo in pigmented rats. Both single flash (SF) and flicker stimuli caused increase in the RBF. The 10 ms SF stimulus did not generate any consistent measurable response, while the 200 ms SF of the same intensity generated ~4% change in the RBF peaking at ~1.5 s after the stimulus onset. Single flash stimuli introduced ~2x smaller change in RBF and ~30% earlier RBF peak response compared to flicker stimuli of the same intensity and duration. Doubling the intensity of SF or flicker stimuli increased the RBF peak magnitude by ~1.5x. Shortening the flicker stimulus duration by 2x increased the RBF recovery rate by 2x, however, had no effect on the rate of RBF change from baseline to peak.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".