Kontrakty z Janem Herberkiem, budowniczym i mieszczaninem kłodawskim na budowę kościoła Jezuitów w Grudziądzu (1646) oraz renowację zamku w Rogóźnie (1647)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article discusses two contracts concluded in years 1646 and 1647 by Jan Herberk, constructor and citizen of Kłodawa. The first document concerns building of a Jesuit church in Grudziądz. It was signed on 2 August 1646, and the commission came from Jan Działyński (1590-1648), starosta of Puck, Rogoźno and Pokrzywno, known for many sacral donations. He undertook to cover the costs of the construction of the church, estimated on 15.000 polish zloty, and to deliver all the necessary building materials. Herberk was obliged to finish his works – along with covering the roof with tiles and constructing six tombs inside the church – in span of two years. Unfortunately, only a part of foundations was laid and soon the works were abandoned. Due to prolonged unstable times of war, the construction was not resumed until 1682 (this time in a different location), most probably without Herberk’s participation, and the church was finally consecrated in 1721.On 1 July 1647 Herberk signed another contract, this time to renovate the castle in Rogóźno. It was built by the Teutonic Order before 1285 and after being taken over by the Kingdom of Poland in 1644 it gradually fell into ruin. Władysław Konstanty Wituski (1603-1655), the administrator of the castle in years 1647-1652, ordered a complex restoration of the building. Unfortunately, the range of eventually executed works is not known. According to descriptions from the fourth quarter of the seventeenth century, the castle was at that time almost completely ruined.Jan Herberk, the architect form Kłodawa, was hitherto unknown. An attempt to find some more information on him in archival documents has not brought any positive results. The existing literature does however mention a builder named Jan Herbek. He was active since 1615 in Szydłowiec, at the time a lively centre of stonemasonry. He also worked in Warsaw (1636) and Kielce, where he built the castle of bishops of Kraków (1637-1644) and – possibly – the church of Holy Trinity (1644-1646). His ties with Kłodawa are not known, so despite resembling names he cannot be definitely identified with the constructor working for Jesuits in Grudziądz and renovating the castle in Rogóźno.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".