De la coimpression à la réécriture : traduire la fiction anglo-canadienne en coédition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent article porte sur la coédition internationale d’ouvrages de fiction. Il s’intéresse en particulier aux traductions de romans anglo-canadiens récents ayant fait l’objet d’une coédition France-Québec et dans laquelle la maison québécoise agissait à titre d’éditeur de tête. Selon une approche sociotraductologique et à partir de quatre études de cas engageant des éditeurs et traducteurs distincts, les auteures mettent en relief la diversité des pratiques de coédition, les tensions qui les accompagnent et les points de recoupement entre ces différents cas. Elles interrogent aussi les liens, décalages et contradictions entre les discours et les pratiques, et montrent à quel point les pratiques et les perceptions des agents engagés dans ces partenariats sont en partie dépendantes de la position que ceux-ci occupent dans leur champ.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.043 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".