De la coimpression à la réécriture : traduire la fiction anglo-canadienne en coédition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent article porte sur la coédition internationale d’ouvrages de fiction. Il s’intéresse en particulier aux traductions de romans anglo-canadiens récents ayant fait l’objet d’une coédition France-Québec et dans laquelle la maison québécoise agissait à titre d’éditeur de tête. Selon une approche sociotraductologique et à partir de quatre études de cas engageant des éditeurs et traducteurs distincts, les auteures mettent en relief la diversité des pratiques de coédition, les tensions qui les accompagnent et les points de recoupement entre ces différents cas. Elles interrogent aussi les liens, décalages et contradictions entre les discours et les pratiques, et montrent à quel point les pratiques et les perceptions des agents engagés dans ces partenariats sont en partie dépendantes de la position que ceux-ci occupent dans leur champ.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".