Bibliographic record
Abstract
Newton trees at infinity of algebraic curves by P. Cassou-Nogues Polynomials $f(X,Y,Z)$ of low LND-degree by D. Daigle Corrigendum to our paper Birational transformations of weighted graphs'' by H. Flenner, S. Kaliman, and M. Zaidenberg Bivariate analogues of Chebyshev polynomials with application to embeddings of affine spaces by G. Freudenburg The pencil of translates of a line in the plane by R. Ganong A geometric proof of Boutot's result on singularities of quotients by R. V. Gurjar On the present state of the Andersen-Lempert theory by S. Kaliman and F. Kutzschebauch Group actions on affine cones by T. Kishimoto, Y. Prokhorov, and M. Zaidenberg $\mathbb{C}^*$ in $\mathbb{C}^2$ is birationally equivalent to a line by M. Koras Initial algebras and the Jung-van der Kulk theorem by S. Kuroda Holomorphic curves on irregular varieties of general type starting from surfaces by S. S.-Y. Lu Locally nilpotent derivations of affine domains by L. Makar-Limanov Equivariant derivations and additive group actions by K. Masuda Frobenius sandwiches of affine algebraic surfaces by M. Miyanishi Automorphism groups of Koras-Russell threefolds of the first kind by L. Moser-Jauslin Recent progress in the geometry of $\mathbb{Q}$-acyclic surfaces by K. Palka On the Makar-Limanov, Derksen invariants, and finite automorphism groups of algebraic varieties by V. L. Popov Embeddings of hyperbolas by A. Sathaye Groups of Russell type and tango structures by Y. Takeda
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".