MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2607763166 · doi:10.1093/sleepj/zsx050.721

0722 NEURODEGENERATIVE BIOMARKER FREQUENCY IN IDIOPATHIC REM SLEEP BEHAVIOR DISORDER

2017· article· en· W2607763166 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
AR Boeve, SV McCord, P C Timm, D. Sandness, N Commers, E J Duwell, GM Tabatabai, SJ McCarter, MR Junna, MC Lipford, Maja Tippmann‐Peikert, B. F. Boeve, MH Silber, Erik K. St. Louis

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institute on AgingNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsREM sleep behavior disorderMedicineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentBiomarkerDementiaOrthostatic vital signsDementia with Lewy bodiesParkinson's diseaseCohortCognitive declineInternal medicineBlood pressurePsychologyPhysical therapyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The majority of patients with idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) are thought to have prodromal synucleinopathy. 25–60% of iRBD patients have probable neurodegenerative biomarkers such as olfactory, orthostatic blood pressure, cognitive, or motor function impairments. We aimed to describe frequencies of neurodegenerative biomarkers in the Mayo Clinic iRBD prospective registry cohort. We included adults diagnosed with iRBD by ICSD-3 criteria, and excluded symptomatic RBD patients (i.e., diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment, dementia with Lewy bodies, Parkinson disease, or multiple system atrophy). We considered clinical neurodegenerative biomarker measures as abnormal when subjects met age-gender defined cut-offs for the brief Smell Identification Test (BSIT) and neurocognitive assessments (Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA), “Kokmen” Short Test of Mental Status (STMS) and King-Devick Test (KDT)), orthostatic systolic blood pressure (SBP) drop >10 mm Hg, or timed up and go (TUG) speed > 7.5 seconds. 38 iRBD subjects participated. Mean age was 65.4 (range 21 - 84) years, and 12 (31%) were women. Duration of dream enactment was 11+/-16 years. 18 (47%) were receiving antidepressant medications. Mean (range) measure scores were: BSIT 8.8 (4–12); MOCA, 26.2 (20–30); STMS, 34.3 (30–38); KD, 60.2 (39–125.6); SBP drop, 14.64 (1–49); and TUG, 8.5 (5.3–13.8) seconds. The number (%) with abnormal biomarker measures were: BSIT, 6 (16%); MoCA, 6 (16%); STMS, 0%; KD, 12 (32%); SBP drop, 15 (41%); and TUG, 11 (31%). Overall, 31 (82%) had one or more clinical neurodegenerative biomarkers at baseline, and 20 (52%) had two or more biomarkers at baseline. Antidepressant medication was not associated with abnormality on any of the measures. 82% of iRBD patients had at least one neurodegenerative biomarker present, suggesting that iRBD is a prodromal synucleinopathy. Further longitudinal analyses of this cohort compared to age-gender matched control subjects is planned. Mayo Clinic CCaTS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesFrench-language works237,207