MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2607774409 · doi:10.1093/sleepj/zsx050.144

0145 CATAPLEXY PRODUCES MUSCLE PARALYSIS BY RECRUITING THE REM SLEEP CIRCUIT

2017· article· en· W2607774409 on OpenAlexaffabout
Zoltan A. Torontali, Jimmy J. Fraigne, John Peever

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTextile materials and evaluations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCataplexySleep paralysisSleep (system call)ParalysisMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationElectromyographyPeriodic paralysisAnesthesiaPsychologyNarcolepsyModafinilSurgeryPsychiatryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cataplexy, a symptom of narcolepsy, is defined as the abrupt and uncontrollable onset of skeletal muscle paralysis during wakefulness. It has been hypothesized that cataplexy results from inappropriate intrusion of REM sleep paralysis into wakefulness. The mechanism of muscle paralysis in cataplexy is unclear, but is thought to result from pathological recruitment of the subcoeruleus nucleus (SubC) that generates REM sleep paralysis. Here, we show that activation of SubC neurons promotes cataplexy in narcoleptic mice, whereas, its inhibition reduces it. We bilaterally infused 400nL of an AAV harboring a modified G-protein coupled receptor (AAV-HSYN-hm3D(Gq)-mCherry or AAV-HSYN-hm4D(Gi)-mCherry) or an inert fluorophore (AAV-HSYN-GFP) into the SubC region of narcoleptic mice. Animals were instrumented for EEG and EMG recordings. Administration of clozapine-N-oxide (CNO, 0.5mg/kg and/or 5mg/kg) was used to activate/inhibit SubC neurons expressing modified receptors. Sleep/wake data was analyzed for 3 hours following CNO administration. SubC activation in narcoleptic mice triggered a dose dependent increase in the number of cataplexy episodes (0.5mg/kg CNO: hm3D(Gq) x=25 ± 4.1, n=9 vs. control x=2 ± 0.6, n=3, p<0.05; 5mg/kg CNO: hm3D(Gq) x=64 ± 12.4, n=9 vs. control x= 3.3 ± 0.9, n=3, p<0.05) and in overall time spent in cataplexy (0.5mg/kg CNO: hm3D(Gq) x=14.6 ± 2.9% vs. control x= 0.6 ± 0.14%, p<0.05; 5mg/kg CNO: hm3D(Gq) x=33.3 ± 6.9% vs. control x= 0.9 ± 0.34%, p<0.05). Consistent with our hypothesis, inhibition of SubC neurons resulted in a 58% reduction in cataplexy (n=4, p<0.05). These results support our long-standing hypothesis that a REM sleep mechanism modulates muscle paralysis during cataplexy. This research was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and the Ontario Graduate Scholarship (OGS).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicTextile materials and evaluationsFrench-language works237,207