0997 CHID SLEEP HABITS QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERNALIZING/EXTERNALIZING PROBLEMS AMONG DISADVANTAGED MALTREATED PRESCHOOLERS FROM CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Internalizing and externalizing problems are common problems among preschoolers referred from Child Protective Services for maltreatment. Recent studies showed that sleep regulation is associated with behavioral problems among non-disadvantaged preschoolers or in representative prospective cohorts of children. To our knowledge, no study has investigated this association among disadvantaged maltreated children. Seventy-one preschoolers aged from 2 to 5 years (mean=39 months, SD=17 months) were included in the study. These toddlers were recruited from five Child Protective Services in the province of Quebec. Mothers have completed a demographic questionnaire, the Child Sleep Habits Questionnaire and the Child Behavior Checklist. Linear regressions were found for internalizing problems (p=.001) and externalizing problems (p =.006) in function of the sleep item «Does not sleep as much as needed » adjusted for sex of the child and age. In this sample, internalizing problems and externalizing problems were strongly correlated (r=.68). Therefore, linear regressions were ran again adjusting for sex, child age and externalizing problem. Only an association was found between the sleep item «Does not sleep as much as needed » and internalizing problems (p =.004). Sleep regulation seems a stronger indicator for emergence of internalizing problems among disadvantaged maltreated children. Sleep problems could be a helpful indicator for detecting internalizing problems among disadvantaged maltreated preschoolers from Child Protective Services. This research was supported by Fondation André et Lucie Chagnon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".