MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2607899612

The Wnt5a-β-catenin Pathway Triggers a Metabolic Switch That Drives Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase Activity and Dendritic Cell Tolerization in the Melanoma Microenvironment.

2017· article· en· W2607899612 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Fei Zhao, Kathy S. Evans, Christine Xiao, Alisha Holtzhausen, BA Hanks

Bibliographic record

VenueDukeSpace (Duke University) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTryptophan and brain disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Cancer InstituteKite PharmaCancer Institute, University of PittsburghOregon Clinical and Translational Research InstituteDeutsches Zentrum für LungenforschungNational Institutes of HealthM.J. Murdock Charitable TrustTerry Fox FoundationUniversity of PittsburghMidwest Athletes Against Childhood CancerNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesDr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research FoundationHarry J. Lloyd Charitable TrustAchievement Rewards for College Scientists FoundationDana-Farber/Harvard Cancer CenterNational Science Foundation
KeywordsIndoleamine 2,3-dioxygenaseMelanomaWNT5ACancer researchCateninMetabolic pathwayTumor microenvironmentBiologyChemistryMedicineWnt signaling pathwayCell biologySignal transductionTumor cellsGeneBiochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BackgroundThere has been a dramatic increase in T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing spurred, in part, by the widespread adoption of this technology across academic medical centers and by the rapid commercialization of TCR sequencing.While the raw TCR sequencing data has increased, there has been little in the way of approaches to parse the data in a biologically meaningful fashion.The ability to parse this new type of 'big data' quickly and efficiently to understand the T cell repertoire in a structurally relevant manner has the potential to open the way to new discoveries about how the immune system is able to respond to insults such as cancer and infectious diseases.About this supplement.These abstracts have been published as part of Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer Volume 4 Suppl 1, 2016.The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://jitc.biomedcentral.com/articles/supplements/volume-4-supplement-1.Please note that this is part 1 of 2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueDukeSpace (Duke University)Same topicTryptophan and brain disordersFrench-language works237,207