DNA methylation age-acceleration is associated with disease duration and age at onset in C9orf72 patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The repeat expansion in C9orf72 is the most common cause of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. C9orf72 patients present with a wide range in disease duration and age of onset. The strongest risk factor for both syndromes is aging, which was linked to DNA methylation (DNAm) age based on the cumulative assessment of the methylation levels of 353 CpGs included on the genome-wide 450k BeadChip. DNAm age may reflect biological age better than chronological age. We conducted a genome-wide blood DNA methylation study of 46 unrelated C9orf72 patients. After correction for multiple testing, none of the CpGs demonstrated association between its methylation level and disease duration or age of onset. However, we detected a significant reverse correlation of DNAm age-acceleration with disease duration and age of onset, suggesting that for every 5-year increase in DNAm age-acceleration there is a 3.2-year earlier age of onset and 1.5-year shorter disease duration. The significant correlations remain after adjusting for gender, TMEM106B genotypes, disease phenotype and C9orf72 5'CpG island methylation status. A similar trend was observed for the blood DNA of affected members of an extended C9orf72 family; and tissues from the central nervous system of C9orf72 autopsy cases. For instance, regression analysis suggested that a 5-year increase in DNAm age-acceleration is linked to an earlier age of onset by 4.7 or 5.5 years for frontal cortex or spinal cord, respectively. Blood DNAm age may be a useful biomarker for biological age, because blood DNAm age-acceleration was similar to all investigated brain tissues, except for cerebellum that ages more slowly. In conclusion, DNA methylation analysis of C9orf72 patients revealed that increased DNAm age-acceleration is associated with a more severe disease phenotype with a shorter disease duration and earlier age of onset.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".