Automatic video description generation via LSTM with joint two-stream encoding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a novel two-stream framework based on combinational deep neural networks. The framework is mainly composed of two components: one is a parallel two-stream encoding component which learns video encoding from multiple sources using 3D convolutional neural networks and the other is a long-short-term-memory (LSTM)-based decoding language model which transfers the input encoded video representations to text descriptions. The merits of our proposed model are: 1) It extracts both temporal and spatial features by exploring the usage of 3D convolutional networks on both raw RGB frames and motion history images. 2) Our model can dynamically tune the weights of different feature channels since the network is trained end-to-end from learning combinational encoding of multiple features to LSTM-based language model. Our model is evaluated on three public video description datasets: one YouTube clips dataset (Microsoft Video Description Corpus) and two large movie description datasets (MPII Corpus and Montreal Video Annotation Dataset) and achieves comparable or better performance than the state-of-the-art approaches in video caption generation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".