MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2608228208 · doi:10.1093/sleepj/zsx050.222

0223 COMBINED ACUTE EFFECTS OF SHORT TERM EXERCISE AND SLEEP ON DECLARATIVE MEMORY IN YOUNG, SEDENTARY ADULTS: A PILOT STUDY

2017· article· en· W2608228208 on OpenAlexaff
Melodee Mograss, Monica Crosetta, Edwin M. Robertson, Véronique Pepin, Thien Thanh Dang‐Vu

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActigraphyNapPolysomnographyPsychologySleep (system call)Aerobic exerciseAudiologyPhysical therapyCognitionSleep diaryVigilance (psychology)Physical medicine and rehabilitationMedicineInsomniaPsychiatryElectroencephalographyCognitive psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research has provided evidence for the beneficial role of exercise in enhancing cognition and improving sleep. Sleep has been linked to memory processing and enhanced performance. Little is known about the effects of moderating factors. We aim to test the idea that a nap and a single aerobic exercise session may have synergistic, complementary effects on long-term memory in young sedentary adults. Participants were screened based on a history of having a low-to-moderate level of physical activity. Participants underwent medical and psychological evaluations, sleep screening, 10-day sleep diary and actigraphy. The study involved a between-subject design with three groups (N=5/group): 1) exercise+nap (ExNap), nap only (NoExNap), exercise only (ExNoNap). During the experimental procedure, participants were provided with a lunch after undergoing 40min of moderate-intensity cycling, followed by a study session (13h30), and a 60min nap (14h00). At the test session (17h00), the participants completed a recognition task whereby 45 of the previously studied photos were intermixed with 45 “foils”. The participant’s task was to indicate the previously presented photos by pressing a key on a computer. Polysomnography was used to monitor sleep. A visual analog scale for vigilance was administered prior to the memory testing. The outcome variables were accuracy, reaction times (RT) and sleep metrics (%N3, %N2, TST). We have preliminary data in 15 healthy, normal weight young adults (Mage23 ± 3.11SD yrs). We interpreted our results based on effect size, Cohen’s d calculations. A comparison between the groups showed that the ExNap group was more accurate than the NoExNap group (M±SD 93.8%±2.9 vs. 91.3%±8.7, respectively), d=.38. Furthermore, the NoExNap and the ExNap group were more accurate than the ExNoNap group (89.6%±6.6), d=.23 and d=.83, respectively. Pearson correlations revealed no significant associations between performance on the memory task and groups, or between RTs and sleep variables. These preliminary data, obtained in a small sample, support our hypothesis and suggest that a single moderate-intensity aerobic exercise session and a daytime nap may improve memory performance more than a nap or exercise alone in young adults with a sedentary lifestyle. American Sleep Medicine Foundation FPA 2016.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFrench-language works237,207