I centri sociali come spazio pubblico. Un caso di studio a Napoli
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
English“Social centers” as public spaces: a case study in Naples. – This article presents the idea of the “social centers” as public spaces via the exposition of a case study in the city of Naples. Social centers are a particular kind of autonomous and informal social organization usually located in occupied buildings. This study has the aim of explaining how and in what terms the “social centers” can be conceived as public spaces. The article originates from a theoretical and practical analysis and in particular it focuses on the Damm, an occupied building in the popular quarter of Montesanto, and on the neighboring Ventaglieri Park, both considered as expressions of a grassroots urban planning. Linked to a pre-existent history of intervention in the area, the Damm has been occupied in 1995 and since then it has conducted several activities to help the inhabitants of Montesanto reclaiming their often neglected public spaces and living them critically. The article concludes by suggesting a scalar lecture of the phenomenon to understand it in a broader perspective. francaisLes centres sociaux comme espaces publiques: un cas d’etude a Naples. – Cet article presente, par un cas d’etude dans la ville de Naples, l’idee que les “centres sociaux” peuvent etre consideres des espaces publiques. Les “centres sociaux” sont des particulieres formes d’auto-organisation politique diffusees sur le territoire italien depuis les annees ‘70. Pour expliquer comme et dans quels termes le “centres sociaux” peuvent etre regardes comme des espaces publiques, cet etude prend en consideration le Damm, un espace occupe dans le quartier de Montesanto. L’article est base sur un travail de terrain, en particulier a contact avec la vie quotidienne du centre sociale et du parc publique a cote, le Parco Ventaglieri, et il explique leur role dans une planification urbaine geree par le habitants de la zone. Lie a une histoire precedente d’intervention sur le territoire, le Damm a ete occupe en 1995 et depuis ce moment il a conduit des differentes activites pour aider les habitants de Montesanto a s’emparer des espaces publiques du quartier, souvent negliges. L’article conclut en proposant une lecture scalaire du phenomene pour le comprendre dans une perspective plus large.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it