MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2609279880 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.125153

Quantum oscillations in Weyl semimetals: A surface theory approach

2017· article· en· W2609279880 on OpenAlexafffund
Jan Borchmann, T. Pereg-Barnea

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTopological Materials and Phenomena
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSemiclassical physicsLandau quantizationPhysicsWeyl semimetalQuantum oscillationsQuantum mechanicsCondensed matter physicsPosition and momentum spaceSurface (topology)Shubnikov–de Haas effectFermi surfaceMomentum (technical analysis)SemimetalElectronQuantumBand gapGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Weyl semimetals are characterized by an even number of bulk Weyl points and surface Fermi arcs connecting their surface projections. It has been shown that when a magnetic field is applied perpendicular to the surface, an unusual kind of quantum oscillations appear. Semiclassically, these oscillations are associated with electron motion in momentum space on the surface Fermi arcs as well as tunneling between the top and bottom surfaces through the bulk chiral Landau level. In this work, we develop an effective surface theory for Weyl semimetals by integrating out the bulk, leaving only the top and bottom infinite surfaces. We use our model to analyze the Landau level spectrum and compare the results with a full three-dimensional calculation as well as the semiclassical theory. We find that the surface theory is a good approximation for the three-dimensional model and agrees with the semiclassical analysis whenever the Weyl points are far from each other. We analytically analyze the case of overlapping Weyl points with short Fermi arcs and find an energy gap which appears as a phase shift in the quantum oscillations, in agreement with our numerics. We also study the case of a type-II Weyl semimetal and show that the absence of the bulk chiral Landau level prevents the formation of surface Landau levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicTopological Materials and PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207